What is a major disadvantage of using compressed air to drive tools compared to electricity or steam?

The option highlighting the expense and complexity of installing air transmission piping points to a significant disadvantage of using compressed air to drive tools. Compressed air systems necessitate a network of pipes to transport air from a compressor to the tools, which can be cost-prohibitive due to the materials needed, particularly if installations must accommodate long distances or multiple tools. This installation process can also involve significant labor and time, further increasing the overall cost.

On the other hand, electricity can typically be delivered through simpler wiring systems, and steam systems can effectively utilize existing infrastructure without the heavy reliance on dedicated piping. This makes electricity and steam often more convenient and less burdensome in terms of initial setup costs.

While the other options may address various attributes of compressed air tools, they do not encapsulate the broad implications of installation challenges and costs associated with air transmission systems as effectively as the correct choice.